最近一个月，好像自己真的好忙。从“当当网”的项目结束就直接进入了“华谊兄弟”的项目，似乎没有喘息的机会。

除此之外还有半米高的英文书要看。好像忙的没有时间吃饭睡觉一样，呵呵，不过生活依然很有规律的继续着。

每天早上都想要把闹钟扔掉，不过它目前尚存。每天坚持不加班，很好的安排下班后的时间，健身，跑步，打球。

每晚回来的路上路过花店买些鲜花，让我的小窝看起来很温馨。最近不太喜欢买百合了，觉得马蹄莲要更漂亮。

或者给小鱼买一点吃的。那棵小榕树长大了，昨天给它换了个大花盆。

豆瓣好像也长大了，叶子绿绿的，看起来好舒服。(*^__^*)

等我的花花草草长大了，我也要跟昊昊养的小菊花比一比。让她气人。呵呵

 

可能是天气巨变，最近也没有好好的休息，再加上有点受凉，昨天开始后背又有一点疼痛。我自己也没有怎么在意。

可是可爱的东东让我好感动，“佳佳什么时候到家？我已经煮了米饭，还给你买了排骨煲了汤，回来好好给你补补”。这样的一条短信让我心里暖暖滴。

回到家，三个菜一个汤。哈哈。心里好暖。自从东东来了以后，每天快下班都会收到同样的短信，几乎是每天回家都是饭菜准备好的，呵呵，幸福。

东东，有你真好！

The argument that this warning system will virtually solve the proboem of midair plane collisions omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument. The statement that follows the description of what this warning system will do simple describes the waining system, and it certainly does not provide support or proof of the main argument.

Most conspicuously, the argument does not address the cause of the problem of midair plane collision, the use of the system by pilots and filght specialisis, or who is involved in the midair plane collisions.First, the argument assumes that the cause of the promble is that the planes' courses,the likelihood of collisions, and actions to avoid collisions are unknown or inaccurate. In a weak attempt to support its claim, the argument describes a system that makes all of the these things accurately known. But if the cause of the problem of midair plane collisinons is that pilots are not paying attention to their computer system or flight operations, the warning system will not sovle the collision problem .Second, the argument never addresses the interface between individuals and the system and how this will affect the warning system's objective of obliterating the problem of collisions. If the pilot or flight specialist does not conform to what the warning system suggests, midair collision will not be avoided. Finally, if planes other than commercial airlines are involved in the collisions, the problem of these collisions cannot be solved by a warning system that will not be installed on non-commercial airlines.The argument also dose not address what would happen in the event that the warning system collapse, fails or does not work properly.

 

Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the item discussed above instead of solely explaining what the system supposedly does, the argument would have been more thorough and convincing.